When you generate a PDF document from LaTex (for example with pdflatex or dvipdfm), it's possible that not all fonts are embedded in the PDF document. Missing fonts can also be an issue when you print out the document. This will cause the document to be rendered differently across different PDF viewers or OS platforms. If you don't embed fonts, a PDF viewer can replace some fonts with alternative ones if they are not available on the computer. When you create a PDF file, it is a good idea to embed fonts in the PDF file. How can I make sure that all fonts are embedded in a PDF document generated from LaTex? However, I noticed that not all fonts used are embedded in the PDF document. Thanks again.Question: I generated a PDF document by compiling LaTex source files. Many thanks :), I would just like to know how to change the Ctrl+C Ctrl+C to both compile and view the file?. (global-set-key 'flyspell-auto-correct-word) (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'flyspell-mode) I want to view my output using evince, not xpdf: (add-hook 'doc-view-mode-hook 'auto-revert-mode) If you like to view your pdf's inside emacs I always use natbib, make it the default style in reftex (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-reftex) Then hit C-c C-c again to view the result. The only really important key-binding is C-c C-c to compile your file. Not saying one method is superior for all applications or not just giving another alternative. All round quick and painless with only limited latex commands to remember (which is the whole point of kile and texmaker). That is when I export to latex and paste in the output into a latex template. Where lyx is not strong is in getting a specified style for journal submission. Lyx is a very mature piece of software now and can do an awful lot. It is rare that I have to dive into native latex code. I write highly mathematical papers all the time and lyx handles the complicated setups very nicely. Yeah I am well aware of the differences and have used all three extensively :lolflag. But to get complex stuff, you need to write code anyway, so why bother? And I could be dead wrong about it not being able to handle complex stuff. That's not to say it isn't great for the 90% of people who only want out of the box functionality. I don't have enough experience with LyX to be sure, but something tells me that if you want to do anything complicated or custom, LyX would have issues. LyX tries to approximate a WYSIWUG (What You See Is What You Get) experience with LaTeX, while Kyle and TeXMaker are for those of us who want to write the code (What You See Is What You Mean, or WYSIWUM).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |